In the Judgment of the United States

These are the official findings of the only United States authorized to act within the proper jurisdiction in effect at the time of the occurrence. These findings are now final by operation of law and legally binding on the United States and the Government of the United States including the administrative, legislative and judicial branches and on any employee of those branches. The chance to attempt to change this judgment by lawful process is now past and the opponents of the United States are too late.

The Government of the United States can now only admit the culprits were wrong in acting against the United States in 1984. Even still, the United States admits the Government of the United States was wrong for aiding the culprits in overthrowing the United States in 1984. There is no other United States authorized to contradict these findings. All opinions to the contrary of these official findings are unauthorized.

1. The United States has many adversaries. The reasons and interests of those adversaries are broad and diverse. Persons and organizations opposed to the United States would include many foreign and domestic threats. A very few of those adversaries of the United States actually attempted to overthrow the United States during 1984. They were a small group of federal government employees.

2. The mutineers included a couple of supervisory industrial engineers, a couple of personnel specialists, an Air Force Space Division lawyer and a HQ Air Force Space Division military physician. Of course, none of them had any authority in General Engineering, the Manufacturing Engineering Mission nor the specific United States Contracts. The proper authorities in power at that time who could have acted lawfully if they had chosen to so act were actually located in New Mexico instead of Los Angeles and all of the mutineers were located in Los Angeles. The chain of command for the mutineers at that time would have required they obtain approval for their actions via the authorities in New Mexico or actually convince the proper authorities to take action except the official files from Los Angeles prove they did not. The proper authorities were not involved.

3. The very few avenues available for obtaining review of the work of the unique Engineer acting in the name of the United States were not attempted. The proper authorities did not pursue any of their options of administrative review or obtaining judicial review nor did the legislative branch act in any way.

4. The renegades own documents of the treasonous acts perpetrated without the involvement of the proper authorities are sufficient to incriminate the traitors. The renegades had many opinions about Engineering and manufacturing aerospace products except they were unauthorized in an official capacity. Their propaganda sabotaged many projects and programs among all of the defense contractors working under United States Contracts. Their bad example of adequate management systems was not limited only to the work of the United States and extended to far beyond.

5. The Constitution and laws make treason a crime. They have not been prosecuted. Their actions were approved by some of the then Government of the United States and the government has so far acquiesced to the actions of those traitors.

6. This is a true story. The culprits overthrew the United States by attacking the private person having the unique authority to act in the name of the United States on all United States Contracts within the assigned territory. The government records of their actions are stored in government files and some are in the public records.

7. There are many possible reasons for their actions. None of those reasons are any good.

IN THE JUDGMENT OF THE UNITED STATES, the United States prevails and the Government of the United States loses for acting against the United States outside of the very few proper avenues.

OFFICIAL: In the name of the United States.
Signed: Jesse Don Hickson III

ORDER: In the event this writing conflicts with any previous or subsequent orders on this subject not made in writing including those discussed by the two supervisory industrial engineers above, this writing takes precedence. In the event this writing conflicts with any writing on this subject previous to the subject occurrence, this writing takes precedence in the name of the United States within the official unique sovereignty. Subsequent to this writing, this writing may only be modified in writing by the author in the name of the United States or by a specific future Act of Congress.

return